Web or mobile applications are ruling our lives. From
paying utility bills, playing games, and browsing on social media to booking
movie and airline tickets and receiving news-feeds, applications are here to
stay. According to statistics, the annual downloads of applications in the year
2020 is likely to touch 258 billion (Source: app-scoop.com). What does this
imply? Our lives are going to be increasingly driven by digital applications.
These bring in their wake attributes like convenience, ease of navigation,
speedy delivery, and security, among others. However, the last one, ‘security’,
has turned out to be a challenge of sorts with cyber threats growing
incessantly.
Today, cyber threats have assumed menacing proportions
with alarming consequences - for individuals, enterprises, and governments
alike. These have evolved with advanced technologies and the propensity of
users to remain indifferent. Cyber threats are just lurking behind the IT
infrastructure waiting to exploit the built-in vulnerabilities. So, how does
one remain vigilant and preempt such an eventuality? The answer lies in
conducting a robust and time-bound application security
testing. It ensures the timely detection of any vulnerability,
breach, or risk, thereby allowing the organization to mitigate it.
It is not that only a certain size or kind of business
becomes a victim of cybercrime. Everyone using the digital ecosystem is
vulnerable. So, as we go about expanding our digital capabilities, we must also
lay equal emphasis on strengthening the security framework. This can be done by
conducting routine software application
security testing in the SDLC. Further, as the Internet of Things (IoT)
revolution slowly but steadily envelops the digital landscape, there is a
concurrent increase in cybersecurity scare. The biggest challenge to have
emerged is identifying the weak nodes among the billions of interconnected IoT
devices.
Planning and running an application security testing exercise can have challenges (and
vulnerabilities) such as:
l Presence of threats like SQL injections and cross-site scripting
l Lack of a proper strategy for application security testing
l Not using the right dynamic
application security testing tools
l Inadequate tracking of the test progress
l Reduced scope of testing due to the pressure of time and speed
l Inability to build the right team and plan
l Failure to adhere to the established security protocols
l Absence of an application inventory. The same would have tracked
expired SSL certificates, mobile APIs, and added domains, among others
How to build a robust
application security testing methodology
The threat from hackers is real as enterprises have
become wary of falling prey to their shenanigans. Statistically, cybercrime is
expected to cost a global loss of around $6 trillion annually by 2021 (Source:
Annual Cybercrime Report of Cybersecurity Ventures.) Also, hackers have been
found to attack every 39 seconds or 2,244 times a day on an average as per a
survey by the University of Maryland. Hence, web and mobile application security testing should be accorded the highest
priority. Let us understand the process to build an effective strategy.
# Analyze the software
development process: Many-a-times the processes drawn
for building software can have gaps or weak links. These can bring a smile on
the faces of hackers. Thus, testers should scrutinize or analyze the
development cycle to identify the gaps or vulnerabilities.
# Create a threat model: Post analyzing the development process, prepare a threat model
to understand the data flow through the application. This way, testers can
identify the problem areas or defective locations in the process.
# Automate: The testing of applications comprises steps that are iterative
in nature. These mundane tasks can tie human resources, which otherwise could
have been used to execute other critical tasks. So, to improve efficiency and
better identification of glitches, the testing process should be automated. By
running automated test scripts, testers and developers can examine the source
code to identify vulnerabilities. Thereafter, the same can be mitigated before
actual deployment.
# Manual testing not to be
dispensed with: Even though manual testing receives
a lot of flak when it comes to the identification of errors, they can be
effective as well. This is due to the fact that automated tools working on a
script can miss certain errors that are not accounted for in the script. This is
where manual testing can help by leveraging human expertise.
# Fixing metrics: The vulnerabilities in an application can only be ascertained
when the features and functionalities are tested against a set of metrics.
These help enterprises to focus on specific areas and improve risk management.
Conclusion
Cyber threats have emerged as key concerns for
enterprises or organizations. They can have damaging consequences when it comes
to factors like trust and customer experience. By undertaking static or dynamic application security testing, enterprises can address such
issues and truly harness the benefits of an advanced digital ecosystem.
No comments:
Post a Comment